论文部分内容阅读
目前,欧洲专利局审查员否定完全公开的做法是颇具疑问的。此做法一旦正式采用,可能会造成更严重的问题。上述阐明的种种原由无不表明:撇开保密性质不谈,标准可以被认为是本领域技术人员应具备的专有知识。按照目前的实践,建议为专利申请人提供更明确的相关指示。在某些情况下,甚至建议采用一系列的标准规范。考虑到进一步的安全性,专利申请相关规定应包含这样的措辞:除强调保密协议的标准外,专利申请的保护应延伸到更广的领域。最好是出台相应的条款,强调相应的领域,而非仅强调保密协议标准本身。
At present, the European Patent Office examiner denied full disclosure is questionable. Once formally adopted, this may result in more serious problems. The various reasons stated above all indicate that, aside from the nature of secrecy, standards can be considered as proprietary knowledge that one skilled in the art should have. In accordance with current practice, it is advisable to provide patent applicants with more relevant and relevant instructions. In some cases, it is even recommended to adopt a series of standard specifications. Taking into account further security, the relevant provisions of the patent application should include the wording: In addition to emphasizing the confidentiality agreement standards, the protection of patent applications should be extended to a wider area. It is best to introduce the appropriate provisions, emphasizing the corresponding areas, rather than just emphasize the confidentiality agreement itself.