论文部分内容阅读
本文通过具体案例考察了因果关系判断的司法实况,得出如下因果关系的司法判断规则:客观自然条件和特殊体质都不应影响因果关系的判断;被害人自主行为介入的,阻断先前行为因果关系,被害人被迫行为介入的,不影响因果关系成立;介入第三人行为时,如果第三人行为不能独立地引发危害结果的,先前行为的因果关系成立,如果第三人行为能独立引起危害结果的发生,则先前行为的因果关系不成立;正常的自然因素介入,其危险性不足以独立地引发严重危害后果,最终危险的实现没有超出一般人认识经验,因果关系成立;异常自然因素的介入提前实现或引发更高的风险,能独立引起危害结果,因果关系不成立。
This article examines the judicatory situation judging causality through the concrete case, and draws the following judicial judgments rules of causation: The objective natural conditions and the special constitution should not affect the judgment of the causation; The intervention of the victim’s autonomy interferes with the causal relationship of the previous act , The involvement of victims of forced behavior does not affect the establishment of causality; involvement in third party behavior, if the third party behavior can not lead to endanger the outcome of the result, the causal relationship of the previous act established if the third party can cause harm independently The result of the causal relationship between the previous behavior is not established; normal natural factors involved, the risk is not enough to independently lead to serious consequences, the ultimate danger did not exceed the common understanding of the people, the causal relationship was established; abnormal natural factors involved in advance To achieve or trigger a higher risk, can cause harm independently, the causal relationship does not hold.