论文部分内容阅读
目的:评估先兆流产应用地屈孕酮治疗的临床效果。方法:随机选择我院收治的90例先兆流产患者作为研究对象,根据随机数字法,将90例先兆流产患者分成两组,取其中45例患者应用黄体酮治疗设作对照组,另外45例患者应用地屈孕酮治疗设作观察组,对比两组治疗效果。结果:对比两组保胎成功率,观察组保胎成功率明显高于对照组,两组对比无统计学意义(P>0.05);治疗后,对比两组血清孕酮水平无显著差异(P>0.05);观察组不良反应低于对照组,两组不良反应对比差异显著(P<0.05)。结论:先兆流产应用地屈孕酮治疗与黄体酮注射效果相当,而且地屈孕酮应用更加方便,而且对患者产生的不良反应较小,值得推广应用。
PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical effect of dorsprone treatment in threatened abortion. Methods: Ninety cases of threatened abortion admitted to our hospital were selected randomly. According to the random number method, 90 cases of threatened abortion were divided into two groups. Among them, 45 cases were treated with progesterone as the control group and 45 cases Application of dorsprungone treatment set up for the observation group, compared the two groups treatment effect. Results: Compared with the success rate of miscarriage in both groups, the success rate of miscarriage in observation group was significantly higher than that in control group (P> 0.05). After treatment, there was no significant difference in serum progesterone levels between the two groups > 0.05). Adverse reactions in the observation group were lower than those in the control group, with significant differences between the two groups (P <0.05). Conclusion: Progesterone use in treatment of threatened abortion is equivalent to injection of progesterone, and its application is more convenient and less harmful to patients. It is worth popularizing and applying.