论文部分内容阅读
最近,董文杰等人提出了一个青藏高原隆升数值模型,钟大赉等人利用东喜马拉雅构造结裂变径迹年龄提出了一个高原隆升实测模型.本文拟就两个模型进行比较,以检验数值模型对高原抬升过程的描述和模拟能力.1 结果对比两个模型的基础不同,着眼角度也不一样,数值模型着重考虑的是两种相反的作用:隆升与夷平,认为它们与地磁极性反转及星际氢云浓度有关;实测模型则是从实测资料入手,得到高原抬升速率的历史演变.两个模型分别得出一条高原隆升曲线.为了使两条曲线有可比
Recently, Dong Wenjie and others proposed a numerical model of the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, and Zhong Dajian et al proposed a model for the uplift of the plateau using the age of the East Himalayan structural knot. In this paper, we compared the two models to test the values The model describes and simulates the plateau uplift process.1 Comparison of the results The two models are based on different perspectives, and the numerical model focuses on two opposite effects: uplift and flattening, Sexual inversion and interstellar concentration of hydrogen clouds; the measured model is from the measured data to get the history of the plateau uplift rate of evolution. Two models were drawn a plateau uplift curve. In order to make the two curves comparable