论文部分内容阅读
除属地管辖原则外,国际法上的其他管辖原则与中国刑法所规定的管辖原则都存在一定的相异之处。我国刑法规定的保护性管辖原则在一定程度上采纳了消极国籍原则,而该原则在国际法上则是被纳入了属人管辖的范畴。此外,我国刑法规定的普遍性管辖与国籍法上的普遍管辖也不尽一致,前者涵盖了条约规定的犯罪,而该种类型的犯罪恰是被国际法排除在普遍管辖原则适用范围之外的。
Except for the principle of territorial jurisdiction, there are some discrepancies between other principles of jurisdiction in international law and the principles of jurisdiction stipulated in Chinese criminal law. To a certain extent, the principle of protective jurisdiction stipulated in our criminal law adopts the principle of passive nationality, and this principle is included in the category of personal jurisdiction in international law. In addition, the universal jurisdiction provided for in our country’s criminal law is also different from the universal jurisdiction in the Nationality Law. The former covers the crimes stipulated in the treaty and the crimes of this kind are excluded from the application of the principle of universal jurisdiction by international law.