论文部分内容阅读
司法改革进入了关键时期,法院的非行政化管理,法官的职业化、法院不主动介入纠纷等已经成为多数人们的共识。但是这些为什么会成为人们的共识?这涉及到司法权区别于立法权、行政权的特性。正是这些特性,使得我们不能像对待行政权、立法权那样对待司法权。司法权的特性是我们认识司法权的重要前提。本文主要分析司法权的被动性和终局性两个特性,希望能抛砖引玉,推动司法权特性的研究,为法治建设和司法改革提供理论支撑。
Judicial reform has entered a crucial period. The non-administrative management of courts, the professionalization of judges, and the failure of courts to intervene in disputes have become the consensus of most people. But why did these become people’s consensus? This relates to the judicial power is different from the legislative power, the characteristics of the executive power. It is these characteristics that prevent us from treating the judiciary in the same way we treat the executive power and the legislative power. The nature of judicial power is an important prerequisite for our understanding of judicial power. This article mainly analyzes the two characteristics of the passive and the final of the judicial power, hoping to initiate the research on the characteristics of judicial power and provide the theoretical support for the legal construction and judicial reform.