论文部分内容阅读
目的:对手术室感染控制管理过程中应用风险因素管理护理措施的效果进行分析探究。方法:将武警浙江总队嘉兴医院手术室在2014年5月至2015年5月实施风险因素管理护理的50例患者作为试验组研究对象,2013年4月至2014年4月未实施风险因素管理护理的50例患者为对照组研究对象。对比分析两组感染控制效果、手术过程效率情况。结果:试验组研究对象的物品管理评分(94.7±11.1)分、消毒隔离评分(96.9±10.3)分与对照组物品管理评分(82.3±10.6)分、消毒隔离评分(85.1±9.5)分相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。试验组研究对象的手术接送时间(24.7±3.5)min、手术准备时间(34.5±3.9)min、手术完成时间(94.2±11.1)min与对照组手术接送时间(37.6±4.5)min、手术准备时间(48.1±3.6)min、手术完成时间(115.3±13.5)min相比,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:手术室感染控制管理过程中应用风险因素管理护理措施效果显著,物品管理规范,消毒隔离良好,手术效率较高,安全可靠,值得广泛推广。
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effect of nursing interventions using risk factors in the management of infection control in operating room. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing operation management of risk factors in operation room of Jiaxing Hospital of Zhejiang Province Corps from December 2014 to May 2015 were selected as the study group, and no risk factor management nursing was conducted from April 2013 to April 2014 The 50 patients were control subjects. Comparative analysis of two groups of infection control effect, the efficiency of the surgical process. Results: The item management score (94.7 ± 11.1), the disinfection isolation score (96.9 ± 10.3) in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the control group (82.3 ± 10.6) and the disinfection isolation score (85.1 ± 9.5) , The difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). The operation time (24.7 ± 3.5) min, operation preparation time (34.5 ± 3.9) min, operation completion time (94.2 ± 11.1) min and control group operation delivery time (37.6 ± 4.5) min, operation preparation time (48.1 ± 3.6) min, and the time of operation completed (115.3 ± 13.5) min, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: The management of infection in the operating room infection management risk factors effective nursing interventions, articles of management, good disinfection and isolation, high operative efficiency, safety and reliability, it is worth widely widely.