论文部分内容阅读
目的:观察不同护理方法对肿瘤患者Ⅱ期压疮治疗有效率的影响。方法:将57例发生Ⅱ期压疮的肿瘤患者随机分为3组,实验1组采用康惠尔泡沫敷料换药,实验2组采用壳聚糖抗菌成膜喷剂换药,对照组采用碘伏消毒换药,比较3组患者压疮治疗有效率、直接护理时间及压疮治疗费用。结果:实验组换药方法治疗有效率明显高于对照组(P<0.05),实验组患者直接护理时间低于对照组(P<0.01),实验2组及对照组治疗费用明显低于实验1组(P<0.05)。结论:不同换药方法对于治疗肿瘤患者Ⅱ期压疮有影响,壳聚糖换药组方法简单、治疗有效率高且费用较低,值得推广。
Objective: To observe the effect of different nursing methods on the effective rate of stage Ⅱ pressure ulcer in cancer patients. Methods: Totally 57 patients with stage Ⅱ pressure ulcer were randomly divided into 3 groups. In group 1, Kangweier Foam Dressing was used. In group 2, chitosan antibacterial film-forming spray dressing was used. In the control group, iodine V disinfection dressing, pressure ulcer treatment in three groups were compared efficiency, direct nursing time and pressure sore treatment costs. Results: The effective rate of treatment group was significantly higher than that of control group (P <0.05), the direct nursing time of experimental group was lower than that of control group (P <0.01), and the cost of treatment in experimental group 2 and control group was significantly lower than that of experimental group 1 Group (P <0.05). Conclusion: Different dressing methods have an impact on the treatment of stage Ⅱ pressure ulcers in patients with cancer. The chitosan dressing group has a simple method, high efficiency and low cost and is worth promoting.