论文部分内容阅读
编者按:本组专题稿件以《中华人民共和国最高人民法院公报》2012年第11期的“焦建军与江苏省中山国际旅行社有限公司、第三人中国康辉南京国际旅行社有限责任公司旅游侵权纠纷案”~①作为研究对象。本案“裁判摘要”的内容为:“旅游者与旅行社签订旅游合同后,双方形成旅游服务合同关系,旅行社所提供的服务应当符合保障旅游者人身、财产安全的要求。同时,旅行社委托的旅游辅助人所提供的食宿、交通运输等服务系旅行社履行旅游服务合同义务的延续,应认定为是代表旅行社的行为,旅游辅助人的侵权行为可直接认定为旅行社的侵权行为。旅游者在旅游过程中乘坐旅行社提
Editor’s note: The articles in this group were published in the ”Bulletin of the Supreme People’s Court of the People’s Republic of China“ No. 11 of 2012. ”Jiao Jianjun and Jiangsu Zhongshan Zhongshan International Travel Service Co., Ltd. and the third person China Kang Hui Nanjing International Travel Service Co., Ltd. Travel Infringement Dispute Case “~ ① as the research object. This case ”referee summary “ reads as follows: ”tourists and travel agents signed a tourism contract, the two sides formed a tourist service contractual relationship, travel services provided by the travel agency should be consistent with the protection of tourists personal and property safety requirements.At the same time, travel agents commissioned Of travel aids provide services such as accommodation, transportation and other travel agencies to fulfill the contractual obligations of travel services shall be deemed to represent the behavior of travel agencies, travel aides tort can be directly identified as travel agents tort. Take travel agencies in the travel process mentioned