“正义不仅应得到实现,而且应当以人们能看得见的方式得到实现。”——这段世人共知的司法谚语,实际上已经较深刻地回答了程序正当与司法公正的辩证关系。 近年来,人们在探讨司法公正问题时,议论最多的恐怕就是司法程序中的“暗箱操作”问题。同样一类案件,同样一种判决结果,有的当事人服判息讼,有的却从一审打到二审再到无休止的提起申诉、申请再审。原因何在,在很大程度上 “Justice must not only be fulfilled, but it should be realized in a way that people can see.” - This well-known judicial proverb has in fact profoundly answered the dialectical relationship between procedural justification and judicial impartiality. In recent years, when people are discussing the question of judicial justice, the most talked about is probably the issue of “secret operation” in judicial proceedings. The same type of case, the same kind of verdict, and some parties serve judgment and interest litigation, while others from the first instance to the second instance and endless grievances, apply for retrial. The reason is, to a large extent