论文部分内容阅读
案例回顾:在某综合医院住院楼配电设备项目招标结束后,参与此次投标的某供应商向代理机构提出了质疑,认为第一中标人所投产品和其提供的3C认证并不一致:第一中标人的MNS(一种模块化、多功能的低压配电柜)产品有3张3C证书,其产品名称均为交流低压抽出式开关柜,不是此次招标要求的插拔式开关柜。招标方应要求第一中标人提供MNS固定插拔式开关柜的3C认证证书和相应的国家3C认证试验报告,如不能提供,则应取消其中标资格。对此,代理机构的质疑答复称:“对于这种MNS柜的3C
Case Review: After the bidding for the distribution equipment project of residential building in a general hospital is over, some suppliers participating in this bid have challenged the agency and think that the products delivered by the first successful bidder are inconsistent with the 3C certification provided by it: A winner of the MNS (a modular, multi-functional low-voltage distribution cabinet) products have 3 3C certificate, the product name is AC low voltage withdrawable switchgear, not the requirements of the tender pluggable switchgear. The tenderee shall require the first successful bidder to provide the 3C certificate of MNS fixed plug-in switchgear and the corresponding national 3C certification test report, and if not, the bid winner shall be disqualified. In response, the agency said in reply to the question: ”3C for this MNS cabinet