论文部分内容阅读
作为一种主观性和个案差异性比较强的一种裁判方法,利益衡量在实际运作中常常具有不可操作性、不可重复性,乃至于不可言传的特征。因此,不可能提供一种一劳永逸的固定模式来指导司法实践操作。但是,基于国内外既有的研究及裁判经验,有意识地对利益衡量适用的场合、领域、步骤、标准等问题,进行理论上的归纳、总结与反思,将有助于利益衡量这一主观性较强的司法方法的正确运用。
As a kind of referee method with subjectivity and case difference, the measure of interest often has the characteristics of inoperability, non-repeatability, and even implausible in practice. Therefore, it is impossible to provide a fixed once and for all fixed mode to guide judicial practice. However, based on the domestic and international experience in research and arbitration, consciously summarizing, summarizing and reflecting on occasions, areas, steps, standards and other issues that are appropriate for the measurement of interests will help the interests measure this subjectivity Correct use of strong judicial methods.