从金融法到金融服务法,仅仅是改换名称而两者在调整对象上没有太大差异?还是不只是简单的名称变化,两者在调整对象上有所不同或者有所侧重?抑或是,金融服务法是金融法的重要组成部分,两者是从属关系?或者,金融服务法与金融法的调整对象都是特定的金融关系,两者的差异仅表现在立法模式、立法理念和监 From the financial law to the law of financial services, just changing the name and not too much difference between the adjustment of the two objects? Or is not just a simple name change, both in the adjustment of the object is different or focused? Or is the financial Service law is an important part of the financial law, the two are subordinate relations? Or, financial services law and financial law are the object of the adjustment of specific financial relations, the difference between the two is only reflected in the legislative model, the concept of legislation and supervision