论文部分内容阅读
批复系最高人民法院“对于高级人民法院、解放军军事法院就审判工作中具体应用法律问题的请示所作的答复”。以法律论证的角度来看,司法批复具有法律解释与替代裁判两种功能,因此可以之作为观察我国法院之疑难案件裁判方法的实证材料。在法律解释的层面,由于中西方司法体制与法律行文的差异,西方法学方法论上的一般解释理论在用来说明我国司法解释操作特别是再解释问题时未必适用。在法律论证的层面,特别是理由给出的层面,我国法院主要依据制定法、司法解释与行政政策作为法律论证理由,但是在理由的给出过程中缺乏必要的具体化解释与正当性说明、同时过分地依赖审判委员会的集体人格权威来作为论证的主要理由。
Reply to the Supreme People’s Court “For the Higher People’s Court, the People’s Liberation Army military court on the judicial application of the specific application of the law made by the reply”. From the perspective of legal argumentation, judicature approval has two functions of legal interpretation and alternative judgment, so it can be used as the empirical material to observe the judgment method of difficult cases in our country. At the level of legal explanation, due to the differences between Chinese and Western judicial systems and legal documents, the general interpretation theory of western legal jurisprudence may not be applicable when it is used to illustrate our country’s judicial interpretation operations, especially to reinterpret the issues. At the level of legal argumentation, especially the reason given, the courts of our country mainly take the formulation law, the judicial interpretation and the administrative policy as the reasons of legal argumentation, but there is no necessary concrete explanation and justification in the process of giving reasons, At the same time, it relies too much on the collective personality authority of the judicial committee as the main reason for argument.